Pregnancy outcomes in late-onset fetal growth restriction: a Delphi consensus-based approach
PDF (English)

Ngôn ngữ sử dụng

Cách trích dẫn

Hoang, N. T., Ho, T. T. H., & Nguyen, V. Q. H. (2024). Pregnancy outcomes in late-onset fetal growth restriction: a Delphi consensus-based approach. Tạp Chí Phụ sản, 22(2), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.46755/vjog.2024.2.1678

Tóm tắt

Objectives: To assess pregnancy outcomes of late-onset fetal growth restriction based on Delphi consensus. Materials and methods: A prospective study in 133 pregnant women with fetal growth restriction according to the  Delphi consensus were investigated at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Center - Hue Central Hospital from May 2022 to  June 2023. 

Results: Late-onset fetal growth restriction rate as classified by the Delphi-consensus was 87.2%. Baseline characteristics  included: average maternal age was 27.4 ± 5.5 (years); unemployment rate was 28.4%; underweight BMI was 41.4%;  smoking (active/passive) was 31%; history of previous late-onset fetal growth restriction was 10.3%; hypertensive  disorders of pregnancy was 24.1%; primigravida was 69.8%; abnormal amniotic fluid index was 31.9%; Doppler spectrum  of umbilical artery with increased resistance was 13.8%, absent/reversed end-diastolic flow 6.9%; abnormal Doppler of  the middle cerebral artery, abnormal ductus venosus, and abnormal cerebroplacental ratio in about 25% of cases. The  abnormal non-stress CTG was 41.4%. Regarding pregnancy outcomes, average gestational age was 37.6 ± 1.9 (weeks);  average weight was 2155.2 ± 321.8 (grams); cesarean section rate was 68.1%, particularly 43.0% due to late-onset fetal  growth restriction; adverse perinatal outcomes were 40.5%. The value of ultrasound and non-stress CTG in predicting  cesarean delivery and adverse perinatal outcomes had low sensitivity but high specificity. 

Conclusion: Late-onset fetal growth restriction based on the Delphi consensus occurred at remarkably high rate. Although  changes in arterial Doppler values have low sensitivity, the specificity is very high. The rate of adverse perinatal outcomes  is notably high, emphasizing the need for early diagnosis for monitoring and determining the optimal intervention timing.

PDF (English)

Tài liệu tham khảo

1. Melamed N., Baschat A., Yinon Y., et al (2021), “FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction”, Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 152 Suppl 1(Suppl 1), pp.3 – 57.
2. Nardozza L., Zamarian A., Araujo Júnior E. (2017), “New Definition of Fetal Growth Restriction: Consensus Regarding a Major Obstetric Complication”, Rev Bras Ginecol E Obstetrícia RBGO Gynecol Obstet, 39(07), pp.315 – 316.
3. Beckmann C. (2014), “Fetal Growth Abnormalities: Intrauterine Growth Restriction and Macrosomia”, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 7th, Wolters Kluwer Health, pp.136-253.
4. Figueras F., Gratacós E. (2014), “Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol”, Fetal Diagn Ther, 36(2), pp.86-98.
5. Kozuki N., Katz J., Lee A. C., et al (2015), "Short Maternal Stature Increases Risk of Small-for-Gestational-Age and Preterm Births in Low- and Middle- Income Countries: Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis and Population Attributable Fraction", J Nutr, 145(11), pp. 2542-2550.
6. Lees C. C., Stampalija T., Baschat A. A., et al (2020), “ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction”, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 56, p. 298 – 312.
7. Truong My Ngoc, Do Thi Minh Nguyet, et al (2020), “Pregnancy outcomes in small-for-gestational-age fetuses”, Vietnamese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 18(1), p. 32-37.
8. Blencowe H., Krasevec J., de Onis M., et al (2019), “National, regional, and worldwide estimates of low birthweight in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis”, Lancet Glob Health, 7(7), pp. e849-e860.
9. Lees C. C., Romero R., Stampalija T., et al (2022), “Clinical Opinion: The diagnosis and management of suspected fetal growth restriction: an evidence-based approach”, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 226(3), pp.366–378.
10. Gordijn S. J., Beune I. M., Thilaganathan B., et al (2016), “Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure”, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 48, pp.333– 339.
11. Catov J. M., Nohr E. A., Olsen J. et al (2008), "Chronic hypertension related to risk for preterm and term small for gestational age births", Obstet Gynecol, 112(2 Pt 1), pp. 290-296.
12. Chew L. C., Verma R. P. (2023), “Fetal Growth Restriction”, In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; August 8, 2023.
13. Crovetto F., Triunfo S., Crispi F., et al (2016), “First-trimester screening with specific algorithms for early- and late-onset fetal growth restriction”, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 48(3), pp.340-348.
14. Feng Y., Zheng H., Fang D., et al (2022), “Prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction using a combined first- and second-trimester screening model”, J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 51(2), pp.102273.
15. Goto E. (2013), "Prediction of low birthweight and small for gestational age from symphysis-fundal height mainly in developing countries: a meta-analysis", J Epidemiol Community Health, 67(12), pp. 999-1005.
16. Kovo M., Schreiber L., Ben-Haroush A., et al (2013), “The placental factor in early- and late-onset normotensive fetal growth restriction”, Placenta, 34(4), pp.320-324.
17. Chew L. C., Verma R. P. (2023), “Fetal Growth Restriction”, In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; August 8, 2023.
18. Shah P. S., Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of L. B. W. P. T. births (2010), "Parity and low birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analyses", Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 89(7), pp. 862-875.
19. Unterscheider Julia, et al. (2013), "Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO Study." American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 208.4 (2013): 290-e1.
20. Feng Y., Zheng H., Fang D., et al (2022), “Prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction using a combined first- and second-trimester screening model”, J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 51(2), pp.102273.
21. Yang Z., Lv W., Zhao B., et al (2022), “Uteroplacental-Cerebral Ratio: A Doppler Parameter for Prognostic Prediction of Late-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction: Single Center Prospective Cohort Study”, J Clin Med, 12(1):275.
22. Molina L. C. G., Odibo L., Zientara S., et al (2020), “Validation of Delphi procedure consensus criteria for defining fetal growth restriction”, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 56, pp.61– 66.
23. Villalaín C., Herraiz I., Quezada M.S., et al (2018), “Fetal Biometry and Doppler Study for the Assessment of Perinatal Outcome in Stage I Late-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction”, Fetal Diagn Ther, 44(4), pp.264 - 270.
Creative Commons License

Công trình này được cấp phép theo Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. .

Download

Dữ liệu downlad không hiện hữu.