Tóm tắt
Objectives: To compare Dinoprostone to Foley catheter as a cervical ripening method in primigravidae with Bishop’s score less than 5.
Materials and Methods: This study utilized a quasi-experimental research design to investigate the induction of labor in primigravidae with low Bishop’s score. The research was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy from July 2022 to December 2023. Results: In comparison to the Foley group, Dinoprostone exhibited higher efficacy in cervical ripening (74.1% vs. 44.0%; p = 0.02). Dinoprostone was associated with a shorter time to delivery (13.92 hours vs. 29.67 hours; p < 0.05). The requirement for oxytocin augmentation was higher in the Foley group (72.0% vs. 7.4%, p < 0.05). The rate of vaginal delivery within 24 hours was higher in the Dinoprostone group (74.1% vs. 20.0%, p < 0.05). No differences were noted in the rates of overall vaginal delivery. Dinoprostone use was associated with a higher likelihood of uterine tachysystole (18.5% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.05), and the incidence of prelabor rupture of membranes during induction of labor was comparatively higher in this group (40.7% vs. 12.0%, p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Both labor induction methods, utilizing Foley and Dinoprostone in women with low Bishop scores (Bishop’s score < 5), demonstrate comparable effectiveness. The duration from induction of labor to the completion of labor is lengthier, and the need for oxytocin augmentation is greater in the Foley group. However, complications such as tachysystole and prelabor rupture of membranes during labor induction are more prevalent in the Dinoprostone group. The observed complications do not differ between the two groups.
Tài liệu tham khảo
2. Bộ Môn Phụ Sản. Các phương pháp khởi phát chuyển dạ. Giáo trình Sản Phụ khoa dành cho đào tạo Sau đại học, Tập 1 - Sản Khoa. Nhà xuất bản đại học Huế: Đại học Y Dược Huế; 2022. p. 444 - 62.
3. Williford. KCWABAE. Bishop Score 2022 [updated September 5, 2022. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470368/.
4. William Grobman. Induction of labor: Techniques for preinduction cervical ripening 2023 [updated Apr 17, 2023. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/induction-of-labor-techniques-for-preinduction-cervical-ripening.
5. Hiersch L, Borovich A, Gabbay-Benziv R, et al. Can we predict successful cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 vaginal inserts? Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2017;295(2):343-9.
6. Phạm Chí Kông, Bùi Thị Viễn Phương. Nghiên cứu hiệu quả khởi phát chuyển dạ bằng Propess đặt âm đạo. Tạp chí Phụ Sản. 2020;19(1):38-47.
7. Lê Bảo Châu, Võ Doãn Mỹ Thạnh, Đàm Ngọc Tiền Giang, et al. Hiệu quả khởi phát chuyển dạ của sonde Foley qua lỗ trong cổ tử cung trên thai quá ngày dự sinh có chỉ định chấm dứt thai kỳ tại Bệnh viện Nhân dân Gia Định. Tạp chí Y học thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. 2016;16(6):217-23.
8. Nguyễn Thị Anh Phương, Huỳnh Nguyễn Khánh Trang. So sánh hiệu quả khởi phát chuyển dạ của thông foley bóng đôi cải tiến và bóng đơn đặt kênh cổ tử cung ở thai trưởng thành tại bệnh viện hùng vương. Y học thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. 2016;1:316 - 21.
9. Lee DS, Tandel MD, Kwan L, et al. Favorable Simplified Bishop Score after cervical ripening associated with decreased cesarean birth rate 2022 [updated Mar. 2021/11/23:[100534]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34808400.
10. Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Agosti M, et al. Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(4):338 e1-7.
11. Nguyễn Bá Mỹ Ngọc. So sánh hiệu quả khởi phát chuyển dạ của Prostaglandin E2 và ống thông Foley ở thai 37 tuần thiểu ối. Tạp chí Y học thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. 2013;17(1):149-55.
12. Baumont M, Dap M, Schweizer C, et al. [Retrospective comparison of effectiveness of balloon catheter versus dinoprostone for cervical ripening]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021;49(9):660-4.
13. Harper LM, Caughey AB, Roehl KA, et al. Defining an abnormal first stage of labor based on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(6):536.e1-7.
14. Blair R, Harvey M-A, Pudwell J, et al. Retrospective Comparison of PGE2 Vaginal Insert and Foley Catheter for Outpatient Cervical Ripening. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2020;42(9):1103-10.
15. Wang H, Hong S, Liu Y, et al. Controlled-release dinoprostone insert versus Foley catheter for labor induction: a meta-analysis. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2016;29(14):2382-8.
Công trình này được cấp phép theo Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. .